We finished a strong year, but perhaps not as strong as the numbers appear. Remember, we started from a low point after the market tanked in the 4th quarter of 2018 when the market decided the Fed was tightening too fast. The Fed reversed course, and after a few zig-zags rallied to finish strong.
I look for the stock market to return around 10% per year ON AVERAGE. Rarely does it go up 10% in any given year. It seems to be either +20% or more or -10% to flat. Furthermore, on average it goes up about 2 out of 3 years. That means it goes DOWN about 1 in every 3 years. We emphasize planning for liquidity to reduce the need to sell when the market is down. Financial planning helps define when, and how much you expect to need from your portfolio, at least for major events you can plan for.
A good year in the market does not change affect the probability that the next year will be up or down. Much like flipping a coin, the market has no memory. The market reflects what is known and expected at any given time. You can’t time the market and go to cash after years the market goes up by more than average and expect to improve the odds. That’s the gambler’s fallacy.
I view the current rally as a high risk, risk-on market. The rally is high risk because it occurred while 3 significant geopolitical events were happening: impeachment, trade war, and Brexit. A negative outcome from the market’s perspective in any one of these events could have precipitated a market correction. The trade war and Brexit appear to be moving toward a positive direction. Although pro-business Trump has been impeached by the House, the market appears to discount the possibility of conviction in the Senate.
Where do we go from here? The key variables include interest rates, valuation, and earnings. Economic indicators point to continued slow expansion rather than recession. Generous valuation is a function of low interest rates. Low interest rates coupled with continuing slow expansion can sustain current valuations. The wild card seems to be inflation. Although there is little indication that it will accelerate, it is notoriously hard to predict. The Fed wants higher inflation, and inflation could erase some Government debt (they pay it off with cheaper dollars). The Government would benefit from higher inflation. Inflation drives long-term interest rates and that would challenge valuations. Fortunately, as the last 10 years indicate, it is hard to generate inflation without stronger growth, but faster growth would help offset the effect of higher interest rates.
This starts to look like a circular argument, and that’s good news. Much like Newton’s Third Law, for every force there is an equal and opposite force, the economic forces driving markets tend to revert to long term averages. However, caveats include non-economic events such as wars, plagues, systemic failure, and meteor strikes. Sleep well!
Tag Archives: Stock Market
Quarterly Update – 1Q19
The market peaked in early October, 2018, and came very close to the official 20% decline that defines an official “bear market.” The real issue is not the depth of the decline, but how long it takes to recover. After the market roared back (+13.06%) in the first quarter, we are nearly there.
Last quarter I shared a chart I use, that indicated the market was valued at 88% of fair value. Today, that reading is about 98%. There is a natural regression to fair value. We’re about where we are supposed to be, not cheap but not too expensive.
There has been a lot of talk in the media about the “yield curve” and what that means about recession risk. I wrote a blog post on the issue the day the curve inverted on March 22. Link here: https://www.daltonfin.com/2019/03/22/what-volatility-looks-like/. Sure enough, the inversion was transient, with the 3-month T-Bill currently at 2.4% and the 10-year Treasury Note at 2.41%, virtually flat.
(Caution – the next 2 paragraphs are on the wonky side)
The main problem with conventional yield curve analysis is that current conditions are a lot different from past circumstances, after 10 years of central bank intervention. The absolute level of interest rates has not been this low in any prior inversion analysis. To illustrate why this is important, consider an economy with no inflation. If the interest rate is the price of money, how much would you need to be paid to lend your money to the U.S. Federal Government? Now, add that rate to the expected inflation rate to get the level that the 3-month T-Bill should yield today in a normalized environment. Anything short of that is like a morphine drip to the economy. The Fed is trying to wean us, but that requires balancing the market’s tantrums (see December) which can become a self-fulfilling prophecy if a stock market decline causes a slow-down.
The Fed only controls the short end of the curve. The market controls the long end. When bond traders bet the Fed will cut rates, they buy the long end because interest rate changes compound and prices move inversely to rates. Increased demand on the long end causes long rates to fall. The greater concern is when the Fed starts cutting short rates. That signals trouble because they have more information than anyone else. What does the Fed do when they see trouble? They cut short rates to juice the economy. The problem is, there’s usually trouble on the horizon when that happens. The good news? That’s not the case today.
Volatility is the price of equity returns. We can manage risk if we understand your liquidity requirements. If we can anticipate distributions, we can reduce or eliminate the possibility of being forced to sell when the market is cheap. That’s what converts a temporary loss of capital a permanent loss.
What Volatility Looks Like
It is hard to fathom the sway in sentiment from yesterday to today. Yesterday markets soared despite Biogen’s dismal news about a failed clinical trial that caused it to drop about 29%. Markets closed up strongly (S&P 500 +1.09%). Market analysts attributed the broad market strength to investors getting more comfortable with the Fed’s dovish stance.
Today, alarm bells went off because the yield curve inverted. This shouldn’t surprise anyone. The curve has been flattening for a while. The gap between the 3-month and 10-years yields is viewed as a leading indicator. It will be important to see if the inversion persists. The indicator’s success rate as a recession predictor increases when the inversion lasts more than 10 days. This is day 1. That was enough to send the S&P 500 back down -1.9%.
At the end of the day, there is no material, fundamental change. Sentiment changed, and that creates volatility.
Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns.
Zoom Out
Time brings perspective, and now might be a good time to reflect on that. This month has been exhausting for investors. The damage is relative. If you invested last month and need to sell now, you might have a problem. But if you are a prudent investor with a 3 to 5-year time horizon, I think you’ll be just fine. This is normal volatility. For perspective, consider the following views of the S&P 500.
First, consider how you feel. The chart below shows a 5-day view. Pretty lousy, huh?
Next, we’ll zoom out to a 3-month view. Not much better.
Now let’s see how the index has done over the past 12 months.
As the above chart shows, it has been like a roller coaster, but it is still positive. Now let’s zoom out to the 2-year view. I think most investors would be pleased with the 29% gain they would have received from the SPY, an ETF that tracks the total return of the S&P 500 including dividends. These charts show just the index, excluding dividends.
Finally, here’s the 5-year view that shows the accumulation of retained earnings created by millions of people going to work every day. This is more like it. Now our scary stock market looks more like a not so uncommon speed bump along the way to greater prosperity.
Exhale and have a nice day!
Charts from Yahoo Finance. Past results are not guaranteed. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.
Risks to the Market
Two risks to your financial future include inflation and market declines triggered by asset price bubbles.
Inflation has not been a problem in the U.S. for over 30 years. Three of the biggest market declines in the last 100 years included in the Great Depression, the tech bubble and the more recent Financial Crisis. Each of these events was related to price bubbles. High stock valuations preceded the 1929 and 2000 corrections, and real estate speculation precipitated the 2008 crisis.
The fuel for asset bubbles is cheap credit that encourages risky behavior through leverage. Why does this matter? There is widespread concern, not unfounded, about the effect of rising interest rates on stock prices. But presently, short-term rates are still less than inflation. We need a positive real interest rate to support healthy economic incentives and to discourage speculation. Normalization requires more interest rate increases, contrary to President Trump’s tweets. The improving economy supports current market valuations.
The real risk of higher interest rates occurs when it begins to limit investment in otherwise productive projects. The problem with low rates is it encourages bad investment.
Recession Strategy
I am seeing a lot of ink about how to prepare for the next recession. Clients want to know what we’re doing to prepare. Investment companies are asking me which funds I think are best for the next downturn.
The real issue is not how deep the correction will be. The real concern is the duration of the decline. How long will it take to get back to even? The problem is not that the stock market will go down. The real problem is if you need to sell stock when valuations are low to fund current living expenses. That converts a temporary loss of capital into a permanent loss of capital.
I’ve been investing since the 1970’s. My education and career have focused on economics and finance. What have I learned? In my view, valuation risk is easy to observe, but timing a correction is still difficult. I recognized that the S&P 500 was overvalued in 1998, but it doubled again before getting cut in half in 2000. I observed in 1999 that the market would either go down by 50% or trade sideways for 10 years while earnings caught up. I had no idea I would be right on both counts. Despite that, a diversified portfolio including small cap, international and bonds fared much better.
Systemic risk is harder to recognize. I didn’t see the 2008 crisis coming. But it really wasn’t a stretch to see what asset class was overvalued, i.e. real estate. But then you needed to understand that banks and credit agencies were operating in a corrupt system underwritten by government agencies, that mortgage defaults would create a downward spiral as underwater homeowners defaulted, forcing prices ever lower.
We accept the unpredictable nature of corrections, and that unique circumstances precipitate them. Today, credit seems to be the most mispriced asset class, driven by government intervention. But bonds are math, and the effects of normalization should be more moderate than a speculative equity correction unless there are forces involving leverage that are not on my radar – like the mortgage security market. Still, the recovery of the past 10 years made staying invested worthwhile. We just needed to hedge for liquidity needs over the next 3 to 5 years to emerge unscathed.
What does all this mean? I believe that a heightened level of concern about the next recession or correction is healthy. As investors de-risk portfolios, valuations will be earnings driven, and that’s a good thing for fundamental investors. Certainly war, policy mistakes, and scandal can impact markets, but these events have nothing to do with the duration of a market expansion. They can happen at any time, so why should the risk seem greater now?
My favored strategy continues to be the bucket approach. One of the key benefits of a financial plan is that it identifies anticipated liquidity needs. Given that most market downturns are resolved in less than 3 to 5 years, it is prudent to establish reserves equal to your liquidity needs in something with less risk than the stock market. Accepting risk in the short-term is gambling, and gambling with what you can’t afford to lose is a bad idea. Investors have time on their side as companies continue building wealth even while the market doesn’t always correlate with that. Be prepared, be vigilant, and stay the course until fundamentals indicate otherwise.
“WE’RE BUYING STOCKS THIS MORNING, AND I’D RATHER BUY THEM CHEAPER, BUT I’VE BEEN BUYING STOCKS SINCE MARCH 11th, 1942, AND I REALLY, I BOUGHT THEM UNDER EVERY PRESIDENT, SEVEN REPUBLICANS, SEVEN DEMOCRATS I’VE BOUGHT THEM QUARTER AFTER QUARTER. SOME OF THE BUYS WERE TERRIFIC, SOME OF THEM WEREN’T AT SUCH GOOD TIMES AND I DON’T KNOW WHEN TO BUY STOCKS, BUT I KNOW WHETHER TO BUY STOCKS, AND ASSUMING YOU’RE GOING TO HOLD THEM, WOULDN’T YOU RATHER OWN AN INTEREST IN A VARIETY OF GREAT BUSINESSES THAN HAVE A PIECE OF PAPER THAT’S GOING TO PAY YOU 3% IN 30 YEARS OR SHORT TERM DEPOSIT THAT PAYS YOU 2% OF THE SORT.” WARREN BUFFETT, August 30, 2018
Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Past results do not guarantee future results.
A Letter to Clients Regarding Current Volatility
A few of you have contacted me to ask about the current market downturn, which leaves me wondering what everyone else is thinking. Just in case you find the market unsettling, allow this perspective.
You might recall from my email with the 4th Quarter Reports, sent on January 2, I said, “The market appears fully valued and then some, by about 4%.” In January, the S&P 500 gained 5.62% on little fundamental change. That suggests that the market was overvalued by nearly 10%. On February 6, 2018, the market officially entered correction territory by trading at least 10% off its recent high. That puts it about where I suggested it should be.
I believe the market will trade +/- 10% of fair value about 95% of the time. That means that if a 20% correction occurs when the market is 10% over fair value, nothing extraordinary occurred. Someone who just watched a $2,000,000 portfolio lose $400,000 might not share my perspective, but it’s just math.
According to Deutsche Bank, the stock market averages a correction about every 357 days, or about once a year. The one before this was over 2 years ago. The next question is how long they last? According to John Prestbo at MarketWatch, a Dow Jones Company, the average correction (of 13.3%) lasted about 14 weeks.
For long-term investors, corrections represent an opportunity to purchase quality stocks at bargain prices. The price dip is only a problem if you are leveraged or are a short-term trader.
For now, I expect the market to struggle as the 10-year Treasury rate rises. This pattern is likely to continue until 1st quarter earnings are reported, and corporate write-offs associated with tax reform are behind us.
As the legendary North Carolina basketball Coach Dean Smith was known to say to his teams during timeouts near the end of close games, “Guys, we are exactly where we want to be.” The message was to focus on what you can control and execute.
As always, the first step in building a portfolio is to define the liquidity requirement so we are never forced to sell at a time not of our choosing.
Tax Reform and Earnings Season
If a company wants to take advantage of a tax cut, what’s the first thing they do? For starters, they should accelerate expenses and write-offs to maximize the value of deductions while higher rates are in effect. If so, one might expect some low earnings numbers in the coming 4th quarter earnings season. While weak earnings might make sense given tax reform-induced accounting, uncertainty is never a good thing for investors. The take is that we might see an increase in volatility if earnings disappoint, leaving investors wondering why.
While tax reform is positive for stocks, the path forward might not be as straight as you think.
The State of the Yield Curve
The yield curve is getting a lot of attention because it has flattened 65 basis points this year. Although the yield curve is a good indicator of where we are in the economic cycle, it does not indicate a recession is likely. Fundamental data are supportive of economic expansion.
(Source: Bloomberg, NBER, GSAM, as of 11/30/2107)
The Risk of Cash
The S&P 500 is up 21.54% (Morningstar, intraday 11/8/2017) since the Trump rally began one year ago. While corporate earnings are up, price multiples have also expanded with growing optimism of policy reforms that could further improve earnings growth. This leaves many investors wondering if they should simply go to cash to lock in the gains.
For a long-term investor, someone who doesn’t plan to use the money for at least 5 years, this might not be a clever idea. To illustrate, let’s assume that we perceive an elevated risk of a 15% correction to get back in line with normal growth from where we were a year ago. From that level, we might expect 8% to 10% average annual growth. If we are correct, and the market goes down 15%, and then grows at 8% per year for 3 years, it would still be worth more than if it were left in cash.
To illustrate, a $100 investment that declines by 15% is worth $85. Then if it grows by 8% per year for 3 years (85 x 1.08^3), it would be worth $107.07. That implies cash would have to earn 2.3% per year to keep up, and that is not available in today’s low-interest rate market without material risk.
As a short-term tactical move, cash can serve as an effective hedge against a falling market, but only if an investor has the fortitude to use it and invest when fear is at its height.
Perhaps the greatest risk for a long-term investor is selling out, not taking advantage of a market correction, and then reinvesting when higher prices signal all clear. It happens all the time.