Tag Archives: financial planning

Patience

In my market outlook a year ago on January 3, 2022, I said, “I think a 20% correction would be reasonable… A 20% correction is not fun, but it is to be expected.” I’m not trying to say I told you so, but we need to maintain perspective after a very ugly year. Bonds went down too.

What now? Coming into 2022, the stock market looked about 7% overvalued. Now, it appears to be about 16% undervalued relative to Morningstar’s fair market value index. Since the end of 2010, only about 5% of the time does the market appear cheaper by this measure.

The broad landscape for investors is much healthier than it was a year ago. Valuations have come down. Interest rates are rewarding creditors for taking risk. Things are getting back to normal, and that’s good.

It might take another few quarters to see results, but the 2022 headwinds should turn into tailwinds later in 2023. The issues include slower economic growth, tightening monetary policy, hot inflation, and rising long-term interest rates. According to most projections, these issues should begin to resolve by the middle of this year.

Geopolitical risks around China, Russia, North Korea, and perhaps Iran, remain a threat to western civilization.

Heightened uncertainty makes the stock market go down and that creates an opportunity for long-term investors.

Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future performance.

The Eye of the Storm

The first half of 2022 was ugly, but at least there are signs that the worst is behind us.

Only six times has the S&P 500 lost more than 15% in the first half of the year since 1932. The result should not be a surprise, given the headwinds facing the economy:

  1. Inflation above 8% per year (highest since 1982).
  2. Aggressive tightening by the Fed (1.5% rate increase thus far with more pending)
  3. Slowing growth expectations
  4. Rising risk of recession
  5. Persistent conflict in Ukraine

The S&P 500 officially entered a bear market on June 13, with a 20% decline from the peak. Keep in mind that the market appeared overvalued at the beginning of the year, and now looks to be about 17% undervalued. From these levels, with forward PE ratios between 16 -17x, the greatest risk to the market would be an extended recession with persistently lower earnings. Earnings moderation is priced-in, earnings collapse is not.

I believe this is a good time to add to equity investments. Short term result can vary wildly, but as the time horizon extends to 5 years or more, the chances of attractive returns increase dramatically, particularly from current valuation levels.

Higher Still?

The good news is the stock market had another great year. The S&P 500 was up 26.84% in 2021. That is on top of the 16.26% in 2020 and 28.88% in 2019. That’s quite a run, even if it started on the back of a down year in 2018.

On the other hand, the S&P 500 is overvalued by most standards. By comparison, the Vanguard Total International Stock ETF, was up only 9%. More telling is the price to earnings ratio. The S&P 500 trades for 21.15 times earnings while the non-US Vanguard ETF, VXUS, trades for 13.2 times earnings, a 37.6% relative discount. (based on Morningstar data)

If you have a diversified portfolio, your investor returns have lagged the S&P 500, where performance was driven by large cap tech stocks.

When will things reverse? I cannot say when, but I can imagine how it might happen. In the words of John Maynard Keynes, “The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent,” the timing is unpredictable. The predictable factor is that it will likely require a catalyst to put the market on sounder footing.

Potential catalysts include:

  1. A worsening COVID scenario with new variants and higher case counts
  2. Persistently high inflation
  3. A Fed policy mistake (watching the yield spread between 2- and 10-year Treasuries)
  4. Slowing earnings growth as Fed stimulus recedes.

If one or more of these events occur and earnings expectations decline, I think a 20% correction would be reasonable. The math of a 4% decline in earnings and an 18 P/E multiple fits such a scenario. But things can go right too, so timing a correction is not a sound strategy.

The prudent course is to plan for liquidity needs and maintain a diversified portfolio and perhaps more cash than usual. Think of cash as an option to buy stocks cheaper if they go down. A 20% correction is not fun, but it is to be expected. When it happens, a little cash goes a long way. One more thing… when the market goes down 20%, you only lose 20% if you sell low. The bigger issue is how long it takes to recover. It has always recovered. Whatever you do, don’t sell low

The Pause that Refreshes

The S&P 500 closed the 3rd quarter with a gain of about 14.7% YTD, despite recent volatility that brought it down about 5% off the highs. (International holdings continued to lag, causing diversified portfolios to generally come in a bit lower.) There are several issues creating enough headlines to spook the market, including inflation, the debt ceiling and potential Government shutdown, tax increases, supply chain disruptions, Fed tapering and the yield curve, and the continuing Covid pandemic. What could go wrong?

I could analyze each issue and explain why they might be more bark than bite, or why they are probably already factored into the market. However, I do have a real concern that the market will have to reckon with, valuation. The market is priced to perfection at about 20x 2022 earnings. Interest rates need to go up for long-term economic stability, and the market valuation math means the market valuation multiple needs to decline. The decline in valuation will not be absolute since it will be offset by presumably rising earnings. Theoretically the multiple could contract without a nominal decline in the market, given sufficient earnings growth, especially in an environment with a healthy dose of inflation. However, I expect interest rates will go up and the market will have an adjustment on the order of a 10% decline sometime within the next 6 – 12 months.

That would be a healthy part of normalization and allow for better long-term returns. Part of the past 3 years gains can be attributed to the Fed’s persistent stimulus. We may be beginning the pause that refreshes. The underlying economy is sound. Supply constraints are preferable to waning demand.

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Choose wisely.

Press On

Last year we wondered about the biggest risk to the markets. Was it the threat of persistent low-interest rates and the implied inflation threat, Government budget deficits, tax hikes, or valuations? Media and headlines covered pundits’ messages illustrating what could go wrong.

In retrospect, none of that mattered. The problem was something no one talked about because no one knew about it. A virus-induced pandemic ensued and led to a shutdown of large parts of the economy.

The important takeaway is that the greatest risk might be what you do not see coming. If you are not aware, it is hard to prepare. However, I will point out one more time that I covered the bases by listing plagues among several caveats to my sanguine outlook.

Like earthquakes in California, you know they will happen. You will not know when. In the stock market, we seem to have a big one, a 40 to 50% decline, about once every 10 years. We also average about two recessions every 10 years. Despite dramatic declines, the long-term trend continues up as billions of people around the world get up every morning to do something productive to improve their lives.

I do not know when the market will go down, but history shows that it always comes back. Most of the time recoveries occur within a few years if not months. Some risks are more apparent than others. But for whatever the reason for a correction, the important thing is to avoid selling into a distressed market.

Source Yahoo Finance, S&P 500 Total Return 1/1928 to 1/2021, Monthly, Log Scale

Planning requires anticipating how much money you are likely to need from your portfolio and reducing risk in part of your portfolio to reduce your potential need to sell in a distressed stock market.

Now what about 2021? The 5 key drivers of current market strength include Federal fiscal stimulus, vaccine rollout, divided government, dovish monetary policy, and no double-dip recession. Each of these factors favor continued gains, but none is certain. Near term, I can make the case that the market is on the expensive side. I do not think the options (cash, bonds, hard assets, real estate) are more attractive on a risk-adjusted basis.

As Calvin Coolidge observed, “Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan Press On! has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” I remain focused on long-term value creation.

With 2020 behind us, we’ll press on.

Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future returns.

And Now a Word from Our Sponsor

I was watching CNBC with the sound muted when I noticed an interview. I saw a woman and the graphic, 30 Years of Industry Experience. Wow! That’s all CNBC can say about their distinguished guest? While experience is necessary, it is hardly sufficient. One might expect something more substantive. It’s true that I only have 25 years of industry experience, so what do I know?

I know that the length of time I’ve been a financial advisor says very little about me. In my case, I think the 13 years as a financial analyst, before the last 25 years in financial services, was far more influential in my professional development. The role of a financial analyst is that of a paid devil’s advocate.

A corporate financial analyst is a gatekeeper. Any advocate in a company promoting a project or strategy that requires investment needs to demonstrate the financial effects of the idea to management. That requires a financial analysis of the project to determine the net present value and internal rate of return based on projected investment and the resulting cash flows. The financial analyst must be sold on the assumptions that will drive his models. Garbage-in, garbage-out.

The analyst must drill into the underlying data to verify everything. The marketing, engineering, and new product folks become emotionally invested in their ideas. The analyst must vet the projects as the gatekeeper to funding and balance the interests of zealous advocates against the numbers.

I view investing like project analysis. They both need to pass the expected return on investment hurdles and scrutiny of the underlying assumptions.

Many financial advisors, in fact, the most successful ones in my experience, are successful because they are well-connected and are great relationship managers. They impress, like any good salesman.

Who’s watching your wallet?

An autobiographical perspective from Robert Higgins

Risks to the Market

Two risks to your financial future include inflation and market declines triggered by asset price bubbles.

Inflation has not been a problem in the U.S. for over 30 years. Three of the biggest market declines in the last 100 years included in the Great Depression, the tech bubble and the more recent Financial Crisis. Each of these events was related to price bubbles. High stock valuations preceded the 1929 and 2000 corrections, and real estate speculation precipitated the 2008 crisis.

The fuel for asset bubbles is cheap credit that encourages risky behavior through leverage. Why does this matter? There is widespread concern, not unfounded, about the effect of rising interest rates on stock prices. But presently, short-term rates are still less than inflation. We need a positive real interest rate to support healthy economic incentives and to discourage speculation. Normalization requires more interest rate increases, contrary to President Trump’s tweets. The improving economy supports current market valuations.

The real risk of higher interest rates occurs when it begins to limit investment in otherwise productive projects. The problem with low rates is it encourages bad investment.

The Risk of Cash

The S&P 500 is up 21.54% (Morningstar, intraday 11/8/2017) since the Trump rally began one year ago. While corporate earnings are up, price multiples have also expanded with growing optimism of policy reforms that could further improve earnings growth. This leaves many investors wondering if they should simply go to cash to lock in the gains.

For a long-term investor, someone who doesn’t plan to use the money for at least 5 years, this might not be a clever idea. To illustrate, let’s assume that we perceive an elevated risk of a 15% correction to get back in line with normal growth from where we were a year ago. From that level, we might expect 8% to 10% average annual growth. If we are correct, and the market goes down 15%, and then grows at 8% per year for 3 years, it would still be worth more than if it were left in cash.

To illustrate, a $100 investment that declines by 15% is worth $85. Then if it grows by 8% per year for 3 years (85 x 1.08^3), it would be worth $107.07. That implies cash would have to earn 2.3% per year to keep up, and that is not available in today’s low-interest rate market without material risk.

As a short-term tactical move, cash can serve as an effective hedge against a falling market, but only if an investor has the fortitude to use it and invest when fear is at its height.
Perhaps the greatest risk for a long-term investor is selling out, not taking advantage of a market correction, and then reinvesting when higher prices signal all clear. It happens all the time.

How High is too High?

What difference 3 quarters makes! The S&P 500 is up 14.2% year-to-date, and 4.5% in the 3rd quarter. After the initial Trump rally, nearly everyone, myself included, expected some type of correction. The market continues to brush-off geopolitical concerns. While North Korea might make for scary headlines, the markets are voting that it is unlikely to have a real adverse impact on corporate earnings.

Stocks sell at a multiple of current earnings. The multiple depends on how the market views future earnings. The question of how high the market can go is to ask how much the businesses in the index are worth.

The good news is that there really is not a limit. If a working man puts $5 in a jar every day and does not die, how much is the jar worth? I can calculate how much you should pay for this man’s savings today, but over time, the answer is unlimited.

This is not to suggest the market can’t be overvalued because it can be. Rather, there is no number that represents an absolute limit. I believe the market is moving higher because we have an administration that is pro-business and focused on tax reform. Fiscal spending is also becoming a factor.

There is room for further gains, but corrections will happen. Volatility is the price of equity returns, and that’s been missing for the most part. Stay the course but plan for liquidity.

The Oracle of Charlotte

It’s been eight years since the market hit bottom.  As Morgan Housel of The Motley Fool wrote, “If you went back to 2008 and predicted that over the following eight years the stock market would triple, unemployment would plunge to 1990s levels, oil prices would fall 80%, and inflation would stay tame even while interest rates stayed at all-time lows — I’m telling you, not a single person would have believed you.”

Ok, I didn’t say that exactly, but I got the part right that mattered most.  It was in December 2008.  I was onboarding a new client.  His portfolio was in cash equivalents.  I believed that while we were in the midst of a financial crisis, stocks were oversold compared to intrinsic value.  I told my new client that I believed he had a unique opportunity to triple his money in 5 to 8 years.  Few people are so fortunate as to find themselves with cash at the bottom of a market.

in April of 2009, he fired me.  My mistake was to buy equities in the last days of February, within a week of the absolute bottom.  In retrospect, my timing was nearly perfect, but he couldn’t handle it.  I called him a couple of years ago.  He told me firing me was the biggest mistake he ever made.  I’m guessing it hasn’t gotten any better for him.